Image Image Image Image Image

* = required field

BOM: get the Best of Mosaic Art NOW

Keep up with what’s happening in the world of  contemporary mosaics on your own time by subscribing to The BOM.

The BOM is a weekly digest showcasing three MAN articles and the top five tweets of the week. Sign up below and  The BOM will show up in your email inbox every Sunday at noon Pacific Standard Time.

We hate spam, too, so we won’t share your information with anyone else and guarantee that The BOM will be the only time you’ll hear from us – unless, of course, something really great comes up.

Scroll to Top

To Top

30

Nov
2010

This Article appears in:

Artists
Exhibits & Museums

Read the comments:

4 Comments

Mudlark: Superb New Work by Biggs & Collings

On 30, Nov 2010 | 4 Comments | In Artists, Exhibits & Museums | By man-admin

 Tide 



There has been a bit of chat lately about the definition of mosaic.  What is it?  Is it important to have one? Is there more than one definition?  We find the conversation quite interesting and are looking forward to participating in it as part of a panel during the SAMA conference in February.

It was while preparing for the panel that we first saw Tide (above) by mosaic artist/teacher/author Emma Biggs.  Our first thought was: Now THAT is a mosaic.   We promptly gave our head a good shaking and the better light bulb appeared:  No, THAT is a beautiful work of art.

The seamless warp and weft of water created from disparate pieces of hard materials is technically superb and sensually appealing.  And the story it tells — of scavenging and making and history and refuse and the beauty of the worn — is incredibly engaging.  Tide goes far beyond the current fascination with “repurposing” and creates something movingly reverential.

Ms. Biggs and her partner in life and art, Matthew Collings, are friends of MAN.  We featured their 2009 installation Five Sisters at St. Mary’s, York in the 2010 edition of the magazine and showcased their collaborative work on the blog in this post.  The duo also were jurors for MAN’s Exhibition in Print 2011 sponsored by LATICRETE (results of which are forthcoming).

We threw a few questions Ms. Biggs’ way and she was kind enough to answer them with a great amount of thought and openness.  It is damned good reading.  Don’t miss a word.  And let us know what you think.  All photos are courtesy of the artists.

Enjoy –  Nancie
 

Emma, you and your partner Matthew have just had a show at the Charlie Dutton Gallery in London.  The show was called ‘Mudlark’. Could you tell us why?

Yes, of course. Well, firstly, a mudlark is the name given to a particular kind of scavenger – someone who reclaims rubbish from river mud. In the eighteenth and nineteenth century, some of the very poorest of London’s poverty stricken – mostly women and children – made their living from mudlarking – often by picking coals from the Thames foreshore. It was a dangerous and insanitary job, as the city’s sewers emptied directly in to the river. It was not unusual to come across animal or even human corpses. The river was not the clean, placid body of water you can see today. It was dirty and dangerous, a busy working river. Huge quantities of goods were traded through the docks. The river was more or less the Heathrow Airport of its day.

So our recent show was called ‘Mudlark’ for two reasons. We collected material by mudlarking on the banks of the Thames, and used it as the starting point for the show. But there was also another reason for the title. We wanted to foreground the idea of mudlarking as a job, a specialised activity amongst other activities. Work itself is often a focus of what we do, whether it takes the form of mosaic or painting.

What was in the show?

There were two mosaics, a painting, and a sculptural installation.

The mosaics are made entirely from pieces of broken ceramic – found on the banks of the river. All the work in the show is abstract in nature, although the mosaics play a complicated game with abstraction.

Turner

The material itself may be recognisable – fragments of broken china – handles, bowls and stems of pipes and so on. These familiar objects are reassembled to take on an abstract form. But this abstract layout is intended subliminally to suggest water – in reference to the place they were found.

The painting is based on triangles – oil paint on canvas. It attempts to set up a sense of an imagined space, one without recognisable properties, other than geometric ones. The colours used in the painting are taken from the objects used in the mosaic.

Tower Pier

The sculptural installation is constructed from pieces of broken clay pipe, also found on the Thames – pieces of which date from a long span of historical time – from the sixteenth to the early twentieth century. The colours and forms of this installation – where ceramic fragments hang on transparent nylon thread which moves with the slightest breeze — relate to our interest in an indeterminate three dimensional but imagined space.

What is this interest in labor about? What does it have to do with the way the show looks?

The idea of labour might seem to be an obscure interest, irrelevant to the way the work in the show is made, but it underlies how the work is visually organised.

To give a practical example –the entire layout of the mosaics is based on presenting, in a subtle but self-evident way, the great variety of work undertaken when ceramic is made under factory conditions. Each mosaic groups together a series of similar found objects, pipes, rims, and bases of cups and plates or moulded decoration, or transfer prints, for example. These both embody and represent the variety of ways in which ceramic workers have worked over many centuries. Roles are divided, according to the possession of particular skills, but also according to gender. Women do the decorative work, men do the more sculptural labour.

In these mosaics you are invited both to see these parts on their own — similar materials are laid in sections, so the viewer notices their particular qualities — but also to observe how they mutually relate one to another. It’s not intended to be a slavish complete record of the skills found in a potbank, or ceramic making factory, but rather it is a grouping based on the chance relationships suggested by the material we found. Chance is created by material conditions — there are laws that govern it. It is constructed by the way we organise ourselves in society.

And what does that have to do with the painting? I can see how the mosaic is constructed from objects made years ago by others — sometimes by a whole team of others –  and perhaps you could say it has something to do with the ‘division of labor’ but what does the painting have to do with labour, or your ideas about work?

In answering this question, I feel we should point out the relationship we see between the painting and the mosaics .We have chosen to make them both of a similar size — four by four foot square. This is just one way we established a relationship between them, but there are subtler relationships as well.

The mosaics have a three dimensional aspect, partly coming from, and partly relating to the sculptural form of the fragments from which they are made. In the painting, we try, within traditions established by pictorial language – tone, and colour — to mimic these three dimensional properties, but to strip them of associations given by literal meaning. So the paintings are not trying to resemble the mosaics. They are entirely abstract. They don’t represent anything. They are not pictures of anything, but they do demonstrate the same organisational strategies found in the mosaics. In this case though, they respond to the colours and tones of the ceramic material we found. We aim to create an illusionistic space – something the sculptural properties of the ceramic have as an intrinsic quality – and to create a sense of mutable, ever changing configurations of space. We strive for balance, but also for unpredictability, so the image never entirely settles down. This unpredictability makes the viewer have to do the work. The painting is a proposal, but not a fixed idea. It’s not an ideal, and it resists being ‘knowable’.

But you asked about how this relates to the idea of work.. Well, we think it does so in two different ways. One comes from our experience. Matt is used to working, thinking and writing about art, about the work of other artists, and he carries this idea about the ‘work’ into his own practice. There is a curious conflict here, because he is the hand, but not the decision maker about the paintings. I make these aesthetic decisions. So the division of labour is part of our practice, and perhaps helps explain why we are alert to the subject of work.

But there is another way in which our work ties in to our painting — one that is not easy to convey. Our knowledge and understanding as a society is an accretion of the work of others. We are able to communicate in the most highly sophisticated ways, technologically speaking, because of a history of people who have enquired and investigated and experimented and drawn conclusions from these experiments. This labour is handed down. It’s a sort of legacy, but it is often unseen. In just the same way, historical knowledge from the art world is often unseen. Rules about colour, and how it works for example – all this isn’t reinvented every time in the mind of an artistic genius – it’s a body of knowledge. It’s knowledge that really interests Matt, and one that he attempts to explain in his TV programmes. And I think it’s still relevant to me, as a maker – someone who is probably more associated with ‘craft’ than ‘art’. I think in the world of ‘craft’, there is still a sense of technique as a body of knowledge with some real use value. It is not so relevant in the art world, for understandable reasons.

So would you say there was a psychological element to this interest in the idea of labor?

Well, there may be. It is impossible to escape your own psyche.

*  *  *  *  

For further discovery:

http://www.emmabiggsandmatthewcollings.net/index.htm
http://www.emmabiggsmosaic.net/
http://www.mosaic-blog.com/
http://www.amazon.com/Emma-Biggs/e/B001ITRCDU/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_pop_1

Share this article

Comments

  1. Danette

    This was such a great read. It is so interesting to hear from the artist the inspiration behind the art work. The way pattern, movement and material was used in this mosaic inspires and fascinates. Water indeed! I love the use of the vessels in this mosaic which Emma says are pipes. They are so visceral and earthy. Emma I took your class last year at SAMA and didn't really get what you were trying to teach us about pattern. I get it now!

  2. Kim Wozniak

    Love the insight!

  3. Lea Holland

    Absolutely stunning! Great interview, Nancie!

  4. Sonia King

    Bravo!

Adams.jpgAndrea Sala & Giulia Alecci "Co-musivo" 2013  VideoHouston.jpgJim_Bachor_This_is_not_a_craft_2010_11inx14insara.jpgWebb_Bryant Patio RaysMohamed Banawy  "City 1" 2011  49 x 49 cm  Clay, glass, cement.Luca Barberini Bone Flowersandres_basurto_large08.jpgBeauchamps-SeasonofSunandwind-2AprilBegayhungry-for-gold-320x312Jolino_Bessera_DontCutYourTongueOnTheRhinestonesMarie-laure-BessonFragmentsIVBiggsTide6272969822_38f84a7e5f_z.jpgMeredith Live Oak bark, recycled tempered glass, paint, metallic powders39.jpgMangere+Mosaic.jpgGerardBrandGerstheim2014JesusJo BraunMarco_Bravura_Recuperi_d'_OroSunflowers+smalti+unglazed+ceramic+63+x+48+cm.jpgLilian_Broca_Queen_Esther_Revealing_Her_True_IdentityCarl&SandraBryantCaco3+movimento+n7full.jpgPixel_Context_Pixel_TributeToNicanorParra_2014_150x200cm (3)Photo:  APLaura Carraro "Breath" 2013  123 x 40 cm.  Stones, marble, tile, silicone tubing, PVC, inverted mirror.  Photo courtesy MARRaffaella Ceccarossi "Emerging" 2013 37 x 140 x 12 cm  Smalti and marble.mail-2.jpgCharny Birds in Hair 1000LChinn ArabesqueRamblings_for_sending_copy12.jpgSergio Cicognani Untitled 82 x 90cm  Marble, smalti, fresco paintingSelf-Portrait, 2004-2005 102 x 86Clough.jpgBiggs_and_CollingsRebecca_Collins_StrengthToStrength_2011Luca_Carlo_Colomba_4552.jpgKeKe Cribbs "Casa PapaDoble"  Photo from the artist's Facebook page.DSCN0270.JPGCzapracki.jpgJeanAnn Dabb "Assay 1: Delamar" 2012  20 in. diameter  Bone ash cupels, ceramic crucibles, glass, porcelain.  In the background:  "Core:  Tintic District"  2012  Triptych 70 x 13 in panels.  Stone core samples, ceramic, smalti, woodAndrea Deszö  "Community Garden"  2006Julie_Dilling_Keep_Me_WarmDimit.jpgKatrina Doran  Noli Me TangereGary Drostle, 2010 "Movement and Vitality" DetailDrouin.jpgErcolani.jpgFaileSizeVisionMosaic.jpgneda-600x400.jpgRosanna FattoriniCynthia Fisher  "To Everything There Is A Season, Summer"  2011  25 x 33 in.  vitreous glass, stained glass, smalti, stone, unglazed porcelain, broken pottery, marble, mirror glass, groutSara Frost "Querty" Detail  Photo: via Colossal.comBenedetta Galli "We Are The 99" 2013 140 x 200 cm  Photos and silicone on canvas.Giovanna Galli (France)5pods.jpgRed+Pods.jpgLarry_M_Levine.jpgGoode.jpgElaine M Goodwin Touching ParadiseRoberta Grasso "Memory of a Dream" 2012  460 x 230 cm  Silicon, smalti, ceramic glass, organza, tulle.Jhgreen_wall.jpgfull.jpgErika+full.jpgYakov Hanansen "Brain" 36 x 36 in. Hand-made ceramic tesserae, porcelain, smalti.Hanansen_GRS_framed_2000Hisao Matsuo "Don't Tell What Was Seen In The Woods" 24 x 35"Kim Jae Hee "Corea del Sud" (Uncomfortable House) 2010 40 x 40 cm Nails & felt  Photo courtesy MARProgressonIII Rhonda HeislerIMG_1199.jpgLaura Hiserote "No Time To Be Koi"  DetailSamantha Holmes "Absensce (Moscow)" 2012  260 x 150 cm  Marble, smalti, ceramic glass, gold.hubbell-intro.jpgTessa_Hunkin_Varieties_PeakingDog_PhotoTHHutchinson_Tango_Corto1Iliya Iliev  "Sesif"  2010  70x120cm diptych.  Stones, glassMombasa.jpgPamela Irving "Mr. Logomania" 2013 (Australia)Iskander+Impromptu-in-Blue+2000.jpgKate Jessup "Tense Twinships" 2012  36x52 in.  Glass, wood, thinset, stone, found objectsjones-time-for-lunch-1000Francien Jongsma Simonemichaelferris.jpgZhanna Kadyrova "Diamonds" 2006  Variable. Cement, tile.Kaitis.jpgVadzim Kamisarau "The Main News 3"  2012  50 x 95 cm  Cement, smaltikenawy-memories-full1Keren.jpgKate_KerriganWalkingInRainMatko_KezleInki-400-bimg-kii-blue-grids-in-blue-big.jpgPermafrost+King.jpgAndrej-Koruza-Structured-1-2011-Detailkozachek+Three+Intruding+Fanatics.jpgMichael_Kruzich_SylvesterKazumi Kurihara "Il Libro Legge" (The book reads) 2011 (Japan)Melaine_Lenoelevy-a-man-in-a-waiting-room-300dpi-1000Bett Ann Libby "China Leaf Tea" 2006  13 x 13 x 10 in.  Photo:  David CarasMarco De Luca "La Morte di Ofelia" 2003 123 x 183 x 3 cmLucas.jpgSager.jpgdragonflycompleteMonica_Machado_The_Clothes_Line_2000_260cmCorde-à-linge-Monica-Machado-détailstone-circle-dugald-macinnesMohamad Banawy "Abstract 3" 2010 80 x 80 cm  Clay, glass.MAN2009-Marzi-foto.jpgEaster_Egg_Mosaic_02.jpgAnadoMcLaughlinru paul2.pngHildreth_MeiereCathedral Basilica of Saint Louis, Drinking deer mosaic on northJeroenMeijerMaterNostra2008"More American Gifts:  Grenades"  2005  5.5 x 3.9 x 3.5 in  Ceramic, porcelain, plaster, wire, metal, cement adhesive, grout.the rainJason Middlebrook "Brooklyn SeedsFlaking paint on wooden door, Perthshire, Scotland. Photo: Helen Miles MosaicsAndrea Deszö  "Community Garden"  2006Julian_Modica_zappa.jpgMosaic RhinocerosLynnMoorPipgtailGirlBOMIMG_6541.jpgJinette+Mosaique.jpgMosaïzm "Gallaxiam" 2013 Detail  Photo courtesy MARCleo Mussi "Mind"  2012Silvia_Naddeo-Transition-2012Megumi-Naitoh-4192010-detail-Michael-WelchFamiliarGroundNewton Serenity 2FelicesBalls_4546.jpg8419_1251766378980_1374130919_703135_1818425_n.jpg"Cerulean Rendesvous" Carole Choucair-Oueijan 53.5 x 45 in.    Smalti, 24 karat gold smalti, cristallino, marble, granite111_0424.jpgFamiliarGroundNiki_de_Saint_Phalle_Tarot_Garden114Picasso.TeteFauveSergio-Policicchio-Corpi-celesti-2011"Dama-Dama" (2014) 1385 x 1165 cm.Elena Prosperi "Wakan-Tanka" 2013  60 x 198 cm  Tiffany glass, glass metal leaf, stones, feathers.Allan Punton "The Three Doges" 2014 Inspired by a ghost story by Alberto Toso FeiRebecca+detail.jpgAndjelka Radojevic  My Little ChickadeeGila+Rayberg+Morning+After.jpgSonya Louro do Rego "Fall" 2011 150 x 50 x 25 cm Shells and marble on wood and polystyrene  Photo: NTMP3312140193_3f2f0905ec.jpgNightshirt-Richey.jpegMo-Ringey-Stools-2004Faith Ringgold "Flying Home:  Harlem Heroes and Heroines (Downtown and Uptown)" 1996  Photo via MTA Arts for Transitdiego_rivera1-320x160Anna Rommel "Green Fish"clug romaniaAndrea Sala & Giulia Alecci "Co-musivo" 2013  VideoRuth_Minola_Scheibler_nightflight_024"x4"Peter Rabbit & fence Beatrix Pottermedium_Reminiscence.jpgWINDSTILL+1.jpgGino-Severini-Church-of-St-Mark-Cortona-Mosaic-wiki-cropIlana Shafir WhirlBeneath+1.jpgmail.JPGVox+Sizemore.JPG100_5652.jpgJasna SokolovicSollinger+Old+Growth+2000.jpgCarol Stirton-Broad "From My Sister's Garden #3" 2013 3.5 x 10.5 inPam Stratton "Twin Lights"Hisao Matsuo "Don't Tell What Was Seen In The Woods" 24 x 35"Carol Talkov "What's Inside" 2012  14 x 17 x 4tavonatti+4+close+up.jpgKathy Thaden  The VisitCynthia Toops "Wolf and Dog" 2012 2.75 x 2.75 x .25 in. Plymer clay, sterling silver metalwork by Chuck Domitrovich  Photo:  Michael WelchBrooks Tower "No Pants"  2004  24 x 14 in.Matylda Tracewska "Untitled" 60 x 48 cm. Marble and paint.Matylda Tracewska "Black Square III"  2011  80 x 80 x 4 cm.  Marble, smalti.Crack+true.jpgTunick_07_1Federico UribeVital CU 02vortex+close+up.jpgennisHouse_1428291c.jpgIsaiah Zagar    Photo WikipediaAleksey Zhuchov "Still Life With Bottles" 2012  50.5 x 47 cm  Natural and artificial stone, smalti.